▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that sucralose should be banned due to the health problems. However, the professor in the leture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point.
First, the professor contends that it is unlike that sucralose arouses diabetes. The spike of insulin does not mean anything. Although potato cause similar results, no one rasise a question. Furthermore, people who drink diet soda are often overweight, so overweights are the primary reason of diabetes. It's handled on personal psycal condition, not sucralose. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that there is a greater risk of developing diabetes by taking sucralose.
Second, the professor insists that through many tests, the fact that sucralose doesn't emit harmful ingredient when it is cooked is proved. According to the test, it was heated to higher temperatures in lab, which is over normally used temperature in the real life. This counters the reading passage's claim that ir makes harmful substances when it is cooked. Finally, the professor argues that there is no significant evidence that sucralose evoke strong allergic reactions. Anecdotal data is unreliable because people hear stories from media and doubt their symptoms. However, the tests prove that there are no severe allergic response compared to oter foods. This refutes the reading passage's claim that sucralose has a drawback that it can set off intense allergic reactions. |