▶ Your Answer : In the lecture, the lecturer claims that the reading's assertion is groundless. This casts doubt on The reading's claim is that there are several methods that make using coal without harming the environment.
First, the lecturer argues that converting coal into a gas isn't good. To explain, gasification needs fossil fuels on its process, which also harms the environment. Besides, in order to remove the impurities from the coal, there should be a large amount of water, and it causes another problem too. This contrasts the reading's argument that converting coal into a gas can solve the environmental problem.
Second, the lecturer maintains that using static electricity is not a good idea. In fact, static electricity can only extract particles that don't cause major problems like ash. It can't reduce the amounts of carbon emission which triggers climate change and causes much more damage. This refutes the reading's insistence that static electricity is an alternative method.
Lastly, the lecturer insists that fabric filters are not effective to solve the problem. To be specific, the maintanence costs of them are too expensive in for the long-term perspective. Furthermore, the energy that is needed to operate the device is too huge, so it's not efficient. This rebuffs the reading's point that fabric filters can reduce coal's impact.
Writing 0–30 score scale Good (24–30)
전반적으로 대립되는 두 지문의 입장이 잘 드러나는 요약문입니다. 제가 현재 답안만 보고 판단한 부분이니 실제 답과 비교하면서 빠진 내용이나 잘못 파악된 내용은 없는지도 한 번 더 체크해주시는 게 좋을 것 같아요. 수고 많으셨습니다. ^^ |