▶ Your Answer :In the lecture, the speaker contends that the claim suggested in
the reading is groundless. This casts doubt on the reading's assertion
that GM(genetically modified) crops are good for humans.
To begin with, the lecturer asserts that it is unlikely that
producing GM crops is one way to solve the problem of world hunger.
What this means is that although people can increase crop yields by producing GM crops,
they cannot relieve world hunger. She points out that
the world already produces enough food to feed most people, so but distributing unequally is a
real problem. This is in contradiction to the reading passage's point
that GM crops can enable people to solve the problem
of world hunger.
In addition, the speaker maintains that it is untrue that people
can reduce food prices by producing GM crops. To explain, there are certain companies that
expect profit from selling GM crops' seeds with expensive prices and more water
is required to raise GM crops than normal palntsplants, which contributes
to expensive prices. This is in direct opposition to the reading's
claim that people can lower the price of food by producing GM crops.
Lastly, the lecturer mentions that vaccines made by GM crops
cannot be easily stored and shipped.
She supports her idea by saying that vaccines made by GM crops
are made up of fruits that are likely to become easily spoiled such
as banana. For this reason, people have to keep vaccines from GM crops
continuously cooled, so it is not easy to store. This
rebuffs the reading passage's insistence that people can easily store and
ship vaccines made by GM crops.
Writing 0–30 score
scale
Fair-Good(23-26)
전체적으로 사소한 실수들을 제외하고는
큰 문제없이 잘 쓰셨습니다. 내용적으로 핵심적인 부분들을 잘 포함하고 있는데, 각 포인트 설명에서 reading이 어째서 그렇게 주장했는지에 대한
설명이 짧게 들어가있으면 lecturer의 의견과 좀 더 명확하게 대조가 될 것으로 보입니다. 또한 줄임말의 경우에는, intro에서 먼저 풀어서 설명해준 뒤에
줄임말의 형태로 사용하시는 것을 추천합니다. 수고 많으셨습니다^^ |