▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the speaker asserts that the reading passage's opposition to the use of tamarisk beetles for eradicating the tamarisk trees is overstated.
First of all, the lecturer argues that the statement
of the reading is not true that the tamarisk beetle’s spread is impossible to
control. The speaker mentions that the tamarisk beetles cannot grow in the
absence of the tamarisk trees and that there are many predators to the beetles.
These would keep the beetles from surviving to survive in expanded area.
Also, the lecturer talks that the tamarisk
beetles will give the immediate impact on the tamarisk trees. Since the beetles
prey on the leaves of the tamarisk trees and it is the leaves that require
water to photosynthesize, the more leaves the beetles eat the leaves, the less water
is consumed. Therefore, the tamarisk beetles will help to protect water
resources. This conclusion counters the argument of the reading passage that
the tamarisk beetles take long time to kill the tamarisk trees.
Finally, the lecturer insists that the wild
fire risk is not increased by the tamarisk beetles. This is because the
government keeps alert to prevent wildfires all the time and the fires that occurred
are mostly intended ones. This assertion in the lecture debunks the reading
passage’s opinion that the wildfire risk is enhanced when dead wood becomes dry
and more flammable, due to the effect of tamarisk beetles.
Writing 0–30 score scale Fair - Good (20–25)
전반적으로 두 지문의 대립되는 내용이 잘 드러나 있습니다. 첫 문단에서 공통주제와 두 지문의 입장대립을 소개하는 부분이 잘 드러나도록 reading passage에 대한 언급도 꼭 해주세요. 제가 내용을 모르는 상태에서 답안만을 보고 파악한 것이므로 실제 지문과 답을 확인하셔서 본론 문단에서 꼭 필요한 내용만 정리된 것이 맞는지 한 번 더 검토해보시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 수고 많으셨습니다. ^^
|