▶ Your Answer : According to the reading, the reading passage shows that the historians and explorers evident that the Amazon civilizations high development has not supported in advanced civilization. In the lecture, the professor doesn't agree with the reading passage that the exploration's theory does not appropriate and gave several reasons why it does not clearly right. First, the professor argues that another evidence has shown that there had other sign which ancient Amazon peoples were painted. For example. the lecturer mention that the roads and canals were connected. Then, there has been showned the study which ancient Amazon society's people were able cooperated by working. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that the Amazon enormous community were does not available because of jungle. Second, the lecturer points out that the products of unsophisticated isn't true. The professor said that the one island has a lot of amount of poverty. For example the Marayo Island had a vase and bowls which we can understand that how ancients were lived. This counters the reading passage's claim that ancient Amazon made the highest community. Finally, the lectuer asserts that the European experts's study is impossible, and not true. The lecturer said there was 5 million km2 land remaind, and the European's were not explored at that place. And that place soon covered by Jungle which that research demonstrated by French explorer in 19C. This refutes on the reading passage's claim that Europeans said the Amazon society had the small amount of population, and that is not part of human civilization. |