▶ Your Answer :In the lecture, the speaker insists that Chaco Canyon is hard to
be considered as a residential area, a place to stock grain maize, and a
ceremonial place. (문단구분) –reading의 의견이 나타나지 않았는데, 두 지문은 ~~라는 주제에 대해 이야기하며, reading과 listening의 관계(대조)를
밝혀주셔야 합니다.
First of all, the theory that Chaco canyon could be used like an
apartment is not supported by the interior of the instruction. Chaco Canyon has
only few fire places inside which could serve only about 10 families, and it
has not enough rooms for 100 families to live in. (문단구분)
For the second assumption that the building could have been a
stock for maize, there is no related evidence remained. For example, if the
place was used for storing a great amount of maize, there would have been some
spill of the grains as well as containers for them. However, in Chaco Canyon
those evidences are not found. (문단구분)
The third theory that Chaco Canyon may have been a ceremonial
place because of there is a Pueblo Alto
nearby with many broken pieces of pots is also implausible. In the mound of
Pueblo Alto, there are not only the remains of pots, but also many materials
such as stones and sand for construction. Even broken parts of construction
machines are found occasionally in the mound. So, it is considered as a pile of
construction trashes, and the pieces of pots could also have been put there by
construction workers who had meal in the place. Therefore, with these doubts
or evidences, the great building Chaco Canyon could not have been a place to
live in, store food, or do rituals.(통합형 에세이에서 conclusion은 불필요합니다)
Writing 0–30 score scale
Limited (10-13)
통합형 에세이의 포맷에 맞춰서, 문단구분을 꼭
해주시고, 교재 등의 모범 답안을 참고하여 탬플릿을 익히시는 것이 좋겠습니다. 문법적으로 실수가 없고, 강연자의 의견을 상세한 포인트까지 잘 포함하여
요약하셨는데, 통합형 에세이에서는 읽기지문의 내용 역시 밝혀주고, 이를
강연자가 어떻게 반박했는지를 설명해주는 형태가 되어야합니다. 기본적인 작문 실력이 좋으시니 모범 답안을
한 번 보시고 그 형태에 맞추어 에세이를 작성하시면 충분히 좋은 점수를 받으실 것으로 보입니다. 수고 많으셨습니다^^ |