▶ Your Answer :
In this set of issues, both the reading
passage and the speaker discuss several aspects of whether the Industrial
Revolution leads to good results or not. The lecturer argues that the
Industrial Revolution has brought negative impacts on people. This casts doubt
on the reading passage’s claim that people could develop quality of their life
by improving the Industrial Revolution.
To begin with, in the response to the reading, the speaker discusses
that even the Industrial Revolution gave to a lot of new jobs, the job
conditions were not good. The reason is that numerous women and children have
to work long time. However, they paid little money. This contradicts the
reading passage’s claim that the Industrial Revolution created many jobs.
On top of that, the speaker challenges the reading by stating that
mining did not contributed improve people’s healthy. This is because, the lecturer argues that
mining gave to people horrible dangerous conditions. Also, mining released
pollution things. It is obviously bad impacts to respiratory people. This
refutes the reading passage’s claim that mining could developed people’s life.
Finally, the speaker refutes the reading by saying that improving agriculture
was not good to family farmers. Specifically explaining that family farmers
could not compete with large producers. In addition, their urban life was full
of laborious job. This opposes the reading passage’s assertion that
agricultures helped that people’s made more easily to work.
|