▶ Your Answer : According to In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that there are serious causes that make the distinct ecosystem of Everglades destroyed. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point. First, the professor contends that water pollution can be solved since the government established a new policy. It regulates the agricultural fertilizers having with some hazardous chemical matters and let farmers replace them with other fertilizers which do not contain harmful chemical substance. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that water pollution caused by fertilizers leads to the destruction of Everglades. Next, the professor insists that soil lost can not cannot be the a problem for harming ecosystem. Since now the government is remedying soil and it is pretty promising. They (누구? 앞선 맥락에서 복수 대명사로 받을 수 있는 명사는 없습니다. the government를 대명사로 받으려면 it이죠.) say that the soil will return back to good condition. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that the ecosystem is hampered because of arid soil and because of draining is vulnerable to wind erosion. Finally, the professor argues that it is unlikely that human development causes the pollution of Everglades’ ecosystem. There is a plan of the government that land for sugar will be supplanted by wild marsh that many species can get larger habitats. This refutes the reading passage’s suggestion that human development like such as (예시나 명단을 들기 위해 like를 쓰는 것은 구어체 표현입니다.) construction of farms and houses has decreased the size of animals’ habitats. Writing 0-30 scale Good(25-27) 전반적으로 reading passage와 listening passage의 주장을 잘 정리하고 요약하였습니다. 관사(a/an, the)를 어떤 경우에 어떤 것을 붙이고 어떤 경우에 붙이지 않는지를 확인해보세요. TOEFL Writing은 academic writing skill을 측정하는 시험입니다. 따라서 구어체와 비격식적인 표현을 피하고 정확한 영어를 사용해야 합니다. 대명사를 쓸 때에는 앞선 문장들에서 가리키는 대상이 명확히 드러나는지를 반드시 확인하고 써야 합니다. |