▶ Your Answer :
In the given
set of infomation, the lecture and the reading passage deal with using bacteria
to clear up oil spills. The lecturer casts doubt on the reading passage's claim
on possible drawbacks with using bacteria, by presenting three
counterarguments. First , the
reading passage claims that comlete cleanup of oil spill using bacteria is time
consuming than any other oil removal methods. However, the lecturer argues that
this claim is disputable. This is because a specific method can be adopted to
break up oil into small droplets, making it easier and faster for
bacteria to remove oil spills. <- what method? Sencond,
according to the reading passage, algae bloom, which depeletes oxygen in water,
is caused by using fertilizer to make bacteria to function. However, the
lecturer contends that this claim is disputable. To be specific, fertilizer
is controlled through mathemetical models that determine the amount
released. <-what mathematical method?? Moreover, bacteria
successfully removed the oil spill in the past without causing algae
bloom. Lastly, the
lecturer disagrees the reading passage's claim that oil spill in the deep ocean
can't be removed by bacteria due to low temperature. He argues that as
there are no waves in the deep ocean, <-> 문장 연결 안됩니다. bacteria
is the only way to remove oil spills. Writing 0-30 Score
Scale Limited (0-16)
Overall Comment: 피드백 반영을 안하시는거 같아요. 리스닝 부분 설명 부족 하고, spelling 실수 여전히 많아요. Listening point 2문장 정도로 쓰셔야 독자가 이해 갑니다. 내용을
구체화 해주세요. |