| |
| |
|
In the reading
passage there is ample support for the author’s claim that Lambeosaurus’s crest which is distinctive feature has some roles. However, the
professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point. (서론도 형식 맞게 구성하세요. 듣기 도입-읽기 주제, 예) The
lecturer contends that the claims of the Lambeosaurus’ crest functions are
doubtful. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that there are several
possible functions of the Lambeosaurus’ crest.)
First, the professor contends that it is doubtful that
Lambeosaurus used their crest as mean of attracting mates. This is because it
is well known that most reptiles lure other sex by sounds and behaviors. For
example, crockerdiles(crocodiles) communicate with others by the kind of noises.
This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that the larger the
crest of male Lambeosaurus is, the more attractive to females.
Next, the professor insists that the idea that the crest was
served as helmet to protect Lambeosaurus’s head is not plausible. It
would be obsolete to combat because the crest extended to backward. This
counters the reading passage’s assertion that
Lambeosaurus utilized the crest in attacking other species.
Finally, the professor argues that it cannot be true that the crest
supplied air. The reason is that the crest is too small and fragile to offer
enough oxygen to Lambeosaurus since they were so huge that they needed a large
amount of oxygen. This refutes the reading passage’s
suggestion that the crest which were hollow and connected to lungs provided air
to Lambeosaurus when their heads were underwater to find some foods.
Writing 0-30 Score Scale
Good (24-30)
Overall Comment: 핵심 포인트들을 잘 잡았고 잘 비교했습니다. 문법 오류도 없었고 디테일도 부족하지 않았습니다. 그러나, 서론을 토플 형식 맞게 써주세요. 예) The lecturer contends that the claims of the
Lambeosaurus’ crest functions are doubtful. This contradicts the reading
passage’s claim that there are several possible functions of the Lambeosaurus’
crest. 스펠링 오류도 주의하세요.