▶ Your Answer : In the lecture, the speaker contends
that the claim suggested in the reading is groundless. This casts doubt on the
reading passage's point that they (?) can account for why whales
strandings happen. To begin with, the lecturer states
that wind patterns is not the
main cause of whale strandings. She points out that this (<-?) cannot explain the occurrence (of what?) in the world with variety of wind
patterns.
Also, prevailing wind actually allows water to flow away from land. This is in
contradictory to the reading's assertion that water pushed by winds from the
south and west enables whales to swim near shore. In addition, the speaker asserts that
illness is not the reason for whale strandings. What this means is that this
cannot account for why perfectly healthy whales often become stranded. Although
sick whales went back onto water, these whales didn't return on to shore.<-무슨 뜻인가요? This is in direct opposition to the
reading passage's claim that illness mainly trigger whale strandings. Lastly, the lecturer maintains that
the sonar systems of whales is not a key factor in becoming of being stranded. She supports her view by
saying that most whales well navigate well, so it is unlikely that the sonar
systems mainly cause them to become stranded. This rebuff the reading's
insistence that the sonar systems of whales prominently contribute to whale
strandings. Writing 0–30
score scale Limited(10-15)
대명사가 지칭하는 것이 불분명한 경우가 매우 많아 내용을 정확하게 이해하기 어렵습니다. 각
지문에서 설명된 구체적인 내용들도 빠져있는 부분이 많아 보이고, lecturer의 의견이 설득력있게
잘 전달되지 않습니다. 내용적으로 보완이 필요하고, 지문의
표현 그대로 가져오기 보다는 paraphrase하여 설명해주세요. 수고 많으셨습니다^^ |