▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer claims that
the reading’s assertion is groundless. This casts doubt on the reading’s claim
that wave farms have many advantages.
First, the lecturer argues that wave farms are
not reliable generators. This is because wave farms have many technical
problems such as breakdown. Besides, the power generated from wave farms
fluctuates very frequently. This contrasts the reading’s argument that
wave-energy facilities are incredibly reliable generators. 두 지문의 대립되는 point가 명확하게 잘 연결되어 있습니다.
Second, the lecturer asserts that wave farms
are not environmentally friendly. Like other generators, wave-energy facilities
also contain pollutants. For example, To be specific, there is chemical lubricant on the
surface of wave-energy facilities which is toxic to marine organisms. This
refutes the reading’s insistence that wave-energy facilities are friendly to
the environment.
Lastly, the lecturer maintains that wave farms
are harmful to the natural beauty of the surrounding landscape. Due to their
bright color, they are very visible, so they can have a negative impact on the
natural beauty. Also, they usually locate on the shore, so tourists can be
prevented from enjoying the landscape. This rebuffs the reading’s point that
wave farms do not affect have a bad impact on the natural beauty of the environment.
Writing 0–30 score scale Good (24–25)
전반적으로 내용 요약에 필요한 요소들이 간결하게 잘 정리되어 있습니다. proof-reading시간을 확보하셔서 오탈자, 문법오류, 잘못 서술된 부분(ex.마지막 문단) 등 실수를 꼼꼼하게 체크할 수 있도록 해주세요. 답지에서 잘못 파악된 내용이나 빠진 detail등은 없는지 한 번 더 확인해주시기 바랍니다. 수고 많으셨습니다. ^^
|