▶ Your Answer :
Both the reading and the lecture deal with wave-energy facilities. In the lecture, the speaker asserts that the claim suggested in the reading passage is groundless. This casts doubt on the reading’s claim that the wave farms will be increasingly common in the future. To begin with, the lecturer contends that it is refutable that wave farms are reliable power generators of power. The author who wrote the passage was failed to explain one factor, technical problems. This indicates that new technology tends to cause the facilities to be easily broken break down and malfunctioned. Thus, the use of waves would not be constant and predictable since wave farms may be fluctuated fluctuating. This counters the reading’s insistence that it is reliable to use wave as a reliable energy source. Secondly, according to the speaker, the argument it is disproven that using wave-energy facilities is considered as environmentally friendly strategy is disproven. Convertors include many harmful chemicals such as lubricants, which often leak into the water. The toxic substances discharged from wave farms may have adverse effects on marine organisms. This is contradictory to the reading passage’s point that operating wave-energy facilities is hardly detrimental for the ocean. Lastly, the lecturer points out that wave farms have a negative effect on the beautiful scenery of the surrounding landscape. This is because wave farms are painted with highly bright colors. Also, wave-energy facilities closed to shore will be noticeable to tourists in the area. This rebuffs the reading’s assertion that wave farms do not have a negative impact on the natural scenery. Writing 0-30 scale Fair(20-23) 전반적으로 reading passage와 listening passage의 주장을 잘 정리하고 요약하였습니다. 다만 문법적인 면에서는 아쉽거나 어색한 부분이 많습니다. 수동태가 부적절한 자리에 수동태를 쓰는 경우가 많습니다. 그 외 관사의 사용 및 명사의 단복수가 어색한 경우가 있습니다. (본문 첨삭 확인) |