In
the lecture, the speaker contends that the claim suggested in the reading
passage is groundless. This (Speaker) casts doubt on the reading
passage's assertion that Greek soldiers didn't attack using mirrors
to burn Roman naval ships.
To
begin with, the lecturer asserts that the claim suggested
by recent many experts is groundless (groundless) . What this means
is that now, many materials to suppose what happened were lost, so it is
difficult for them to research what happened. According to a certain play,
parabolic mirror had been formed a long time before the
battle. This is in contradictory to the reading's point that according to
many experts, a parabolic mirror to burn ships had not been created at the
battle.
In
addition, the speaker points that Greek solider could (was able to make)
produce a fire using mirrors. He points out that at that time, Greek
solider was trained to aim simultaneously the same spot through mirrors,
so they could target ship and produce fire. This is direct opposition to the
reading passage's argument that Greek soliders (soldiers) could not
simultaneously focus a single ship with multiple mirrors.
Lastly,
the lecturer maintains that fires created using mirrors could burn the
ships. He supports his idea by saying that Roman's ships was (were) made up of flammable substances
that rapidly lead (to) big fires, so it was hard for
Roman to extinguish fires. This rebuffs the reading's insistence that
the ships could not be burned by small fires created through mirrors.
Grade : Good (24-30)
Overall Comment : 스펠링 오류와 문장의 첫 시작은 대문자로
하는 것에 유의해주세요. 또한 적절한 어휘 표현을 익혀 점수를 잃지 않도록 연습해야 합니다.
|