▶ Your Answer :
In the lecture, the professor casts doubt on the thesis for of the reading passage (그 thesis가 무엇인지는 다음 문장으로 넘기지 말고 여기서 이미 설명이 되어야 합니다.), presenting three grounds for the refutation. Specifically, the lecturer does not concur with the author’s argument that students should not be forced to do volunteer works. To begin with, the speaker elaborates that there are reasonable criteria to evaluate students’ community service. According to the lecture, school programs are well systemized with the appropriate form which can verify students’ participation. This opinion is in stark contrast to the argument that it is difficult to confirm the students’ work. Additionally, the lecturer insists that the students will be inspired to help others even if the community service is mandatory for them. As far as the speaker’s argument is concerned, students may learn the value of volunteering and decide to have an occupation such as a doctor or teacher. This argument goes against the writer’s claim that students might have distorted view of community service since they get compensation after volunteering. Lastly, the speaker asserts that there are already many things practiced without students’ own approval. Students’ responsibility of attending classes and submitting homework is not different from mandatorily taking part in the community service. This counterargument is in opposition to the author’s claim that the program may abuse students’ rights. Writing 0-30 scale Good(28-30) 흠잡을 데가 없는 아주 깔끔한 글입니다. 전반적으로 reading passage와 listening passage의 주장을 잘 정리하고 요약하였습니다. 사소하게 어색한 문법이 있습니다. 사소한 실수도 쌓이면 감점 사유가 될 수 있으니, 글을 완성한 뒤에는 반드시 다시 한 번 확인해 보기를 바랍니다. |