The reading passage argues that the prescribed burning has a lot of problems. However, the professor says that the passage's claim can be wrong by listing rebutting proofs.
To begin with, according to the article, the passage claims that it is not only way to do the prescribed burning in order to manage and controll an wildlife. The passage says that there are various types or managing an wildlife such as DISKING. However, the lecurer rebuts the point of the article. The professor argues that the prescribed burning is so efficient that it can makes the soil keep their nutrients and regular basis of the soil. So, after burning, there are plenty of nutrients and refresh the soil's components.
On top of that, the reading passage also says that it is hard to control and manage the unsafety factors such as fire accidents, disasters and a related weather problems. On the other hand, the professor assets that there are a safety prepare system of burnig process and professional management skills of fire. So, these systematic processes suerly help the burning process to set up.
Lastly, the reading passage claims that it is not economical method to do the prescribed burning because it requires to hire fire staffs, buy a related equipments. So, this required costs exeed the limited budget. However, the professor rebuts these opinion. He argues that it is more economical and practical than any other methods. For example, 'disking' spends more 20 times money than the prescribed burning. And other methods are also required more money. |