■ Direction Read the question below. You have 30 minutes to plan, write, and revise your essay. Typically, an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words. ■ Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Use specific reason and examples to support your answer | |
|
Topic :It is sometimes acceptable to infringe upon people's freedom. | |
|
A lot of controversy exist over whether it is acceptable to infringe upon people’s freedom. Some believe that people’s freedom should completely be guaranteed. In contrast, in my opinion, it does not matter sometimes. This is because it is sometimes needed when to protect public safety and to improve public prohibits.
To begin with, when it comes to protect public safety, people should approve of infringing on their privacy in some measure. Nowadays there are many potential dangers such as violence, burglary and fraud that will threaten to or have a negative effect on people’s safety. To prevent it from people, proper action must be taken before even thought it might be invasion. For example, when the police investigates important incident. They might doubt a person as a criminal. In this case, they have right of search for public safety, although they are not completely sure of it. To prevent more incidents, they can rush and search a person’s home or take him to the police station to investigate. Although action like this is infringement on people’s liberty. But this sufficiently deserves to be accepted.
Another reason that some infringement on people’s freedom is acceptable is that some infringement can occasionally happen in order to promote public prohibits. When many policies such as exploitation of resource and construction of road be carried out, much damage to people’s freedom occur as by-product. However, a result of policies for improvement of public will lead to promotion of social welfare or country’s competition.
Here is a good example of this point. Korea government had a plan to build a new high way over the whole. Although lots of people were opposed to government’s policy for many reasons from their stakes to invasion of freedom, government enforced the policy. As a result of the policy, Many ordinary people and corporations benefit from the highway in many aspects. Criticism against the policy started disappearing after completion.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that, in the protection of public safety and the advance of public prohibits aspects, some infringement must be acceptable. This is due to the fact that positive results finally lead to improvement of people’s lives. Moreover, it is ideal to protect public safety and improve public prohibits without any troubles.
| |
시간내로 맞추려고 발악하다보니... 문법 틀리고 한게 많을거 같은데 일단 그냥 필터링 안하고 올려봅니다~
많은 지적 부탁드려요!!!