ㅋ |
Both reading passage and lecture are discussing whether work-at-home system is good or not. The passage states positive opinions and the lecture is in sharp contrast with it. The lecture believes that although the work-at-home system is an innovation and improved lives in modern society, however, it brought some bad results. To begin with, according to the reading passage, the employer can save money if there are lesser workers in office room. However, the lecture disputes the passage and states an example of a telecommunication company which failed due to this work- at – home system. In this company, the break inside the firm occurred. While processing this system, the company lost money and waste time in real estate. Then, there was less productive activity and this leaded to its failure. Moreover, in the situation of employees, the reading passage says that they can feel happier with familial relationship and also they enjoy personal lives themselves with this system. On the other side of the coin, the lecture includes the idea that employees may be depressed in several ways. There would be lack of interpersonal relationships except for their families. Also, when they do not have to commute, different from reading passage, the lecture mentioned that employees will be mentally separated from home. Therefore, this is an unhealthy way to them. To summarize, the lecture contains the idea that the reading passage has some misguided opinion about work-at-home system. Then it mentioned drawbacks of the system by stating an example of a company as employer’s situation and its consequences in employee’s feelings. |