근거로 들은 부분이 주장을 약화시키는군요. 카메라로 찍었을 때 똑같은 사건이라고 해도 편집자의 의도에 따라 내용은 달라지겠죠. 특히나 방송국이 특정 권력을 지지한다면..그리고 정부의 검열이 객관성을 보증하는 건가요? 오히려 반대로 생각되는데...그리고 시민단체의 구성원 성격에 따라서도 편파적이 될거 같고..전체적으로 편안한 에세이인데 읽으면서 ? 가 계속 생기는데요^^
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The news media is a reliable source of unbiased information. Use specific reasons and examples to suppor your answer. |
There are lots of media or paper that gives us the information. However, some of these are not quite objective. On the other hand, the new media is usually provide us the correct information because it’s operated by public organization and also the reporters are directly show us the situation by camera. So, I agree that news media is a reliable source of unbiased information. First, the news media is reliable because it’s usually operated by the public organization. In contrast to private company or organization, the public system is under the control of the government. And, because news usually deal with social events and problem, the government’s intervene becomes severe so that news media can broadcast reliable information. According to my father who work for the investigate center in the government, the objectiveness of the news has become 95% after government started to check their information. And also, the tension of checking is so intense that the checking usually ends up right before the broadcast time. Second, unlike the other kind of material, news media is showing viewers the current time scene. When we usually get information by paper or video, it can easily be faked or discarded. So, people usually unilaterally pushed to accept that. For example, the national geographic once made the book of the In conclusion, because the news media is operated by government and it shows the current happening, I strongly assist that news media is reliable material than any others. And getting knowledge by news media will surely improve the knowledge of events that happens over the society |