▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that there are many possible sources of ashen light of Venus. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument. First of all, the lecturer questions the validity of the point in the reading passage that the ashen light could result in a chemical process in Venus’s atmosphere. This is attributed to the fact that when the combination of oxygen and carbon dioxide happens, the light produced is very faint. It could be only found by using powerful telescopes, not the simple telescopes most astronomers use. As a result, the reading passage’s first point is contradicted. Moreover, the lecturer casts doubt on the point made in the reading passage that sunlight reflected off cloud is the glow. It is true that Venus is covered by a dense layer of highly reflected clouds, but the ashen light are found rarely. If the ashen light is sunlight, it could be observed more often. As a consequence, the reading passage’s second point is invalid. Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the point made by the reading passage that the ashen light is glow. The energy produced by the collide with plasma’s particles and atoms in the atmosphere does not takes the ashen light because aurorae only occur in the magnetic field. However, Venus does not doesn’t have it. Thus, with such reasoning, the reading passage’s final point is refuted.
Good (24–30) doesn't-->does not 축약형 지양해주세요.
수고하셨습니다~~
|