▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that the hammerhead shark has some advantages because of its appearance. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point.
First, Tthe professor contends that it is uncertain that uncommon shape of this shark can make it them have good eyesight. And he says that the head structure of hammerhead shark is drawback to hunt their prey because of hindering.무엇이 무엇을 방해한다는 것인지 분명히 해주세요. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that the unique structure of the head enhances enhaces its vision.
Next, Tthe professor insists that the shape of hammerhead is not good for the sense of smell by giving an example about a white shark. Although the white shark doesn’t have this appearance, it has better ability to smell things such as just a drop of blood. This refutes the reading passage’s assertion that the head of shark makes better sense of smell. odor.
Finally, Tthe professor argues that the backbone of hammerhead shark makes their movement in faster, not their head. This counters the reading passage’s suggestion that the shark’s head structure get them to turn quickly. lecture가 어떤 근거에서 저런 주장을 하는지 detail내용 간단히 보완해주세요.
Comment : 각 본론에서 두 지문의 대립되는 내용 포인트가 잘 드러나는 점이 좋습니다. 실제 지문을 다시 검토해보시고 detail내용이 빠진 부분이나 설명이 불분명한 부분들을 더 보완해주세요. 대소문자 오류, 수량표현 오류 신경써주세요~ 수고 많으셨습니다~!
Integrated Writing Rubrics Score 3.5/5 A response at this level is generally good in selecting the important information from the lecture and in coherently and accurately presenting this information in relation to the relevant information in the reading, but it may have minor omission, inaccuracy, vagueness, or imprecision of some content from the lecture or in connection to points made in the reading. A response is also scored at this level if it has more frequent or noticeable minor language errors, as long as such usage and grammatical structures do not result in anything more than an occasional lapse of clarity or in the connection of ideas.
|