YOUR ANSWER : In the give set of materials, the reading passage and the lecture deal with three possible hypothesis of the Hohokam civilization's disintegration whether it is truth or not. The reading is providing three pieces of evidence to prove its point, whereas the lecturer argues against it by articulating three compelling rebuttals. ^ The reading passage asserts the idea that formidable floods were happened so that the Hohokam people left the area they lived. However, the professor casts doubts because there are so effective irrigation channels that could prevent the Hohokam people from serious floods. Moreover, although flood is a common reason why local people abandon their territories, but the presence of irrigation system per se is enough to protect it in fact. ^ The reading claims that the civilization could be collapsed by serious contagions like bubonic plague. The professor refutes the idea because the first explorer of the Hohokam society ;: Spanish people came to the area of them after 14th century when deadly epidemic definitely did not present. ^ The reading points out that rebellion is a possible explanation about the Hohokam culture's disappear. The professor challenged the idea because there is no convincing testament about the presence of ruling class in that period. Put it differently, there are no indicators like dwelling quarters and luxuries which can prove their existence. What's more, oral histories of Indians are not always reliable due to non-presence of documents.
Good (24-27)
두번째 본문 -문장의 형태일 경우 :보다 ;적절합니다. -파란 부분 좀더 구체적으로 설명가능하면 해주세요.
내용 정리 잘하셨습니다. 실수들 연습해주세요.
수고하셨습니다~~
|