▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is an ample support for the author's claim that brain scan lie detector is accurate. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point.
First, the professor contends that it is inaccurate because even truth can be regarded as a lie. When people ask the subject on a sensitive topic, a subject might blur out and feel embarrassed. Then detector concludes that as dishonesty. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that the true statements cannot be misidentified by detecting increased brain activities.
Next, the professor insists that people's brain functions slightly in a different way, so there are no criteria. Therefore, an expert should interpret images subjectively. By doing that, the possibility of error goes down. This counters the reading passage's assertion that detector produces actual images, so there is no need for subjective analysis.
Finally, the professor argues that it is better to use conventional way to judge lies. There is a complex mental problem; thus, if subject rehearsals or retold the statement, it can be regarded as being honest. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that detector makes subject difficult to trick the test, so sedative drugs to disguise might be ineffective.
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
GOOD
|
FAIR
|
FAIR
|
FAIR
|
FAIR
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
- lecture/reading detail이 부족해 보이지 않게 제시된 example등을 충분히 설명해주세요. |