▶ Your Answer : In the given a set of materials the reading and the lecture both deal with The Amazon civilization. The lecturer challenges the reading’s passage's argument that the available evidence that the Amazon has ever supported a large, advanced civilization is extremely doubtful.
First of all, the author contends that the dense jungle of the Amazon prevented the formation of huge civilization. In contrast, the lecturer refutes the claim by saying that experts found organized ancient roads and canals pass thorough jungle, which were connected to large towns and villages. This implies that many Amazon population groups could work and build large society together. Thus, the lecturer insists the statement author contends is false.
Second, the writer insists that the artifacts that have been uncovered in the Amazon absence sophistication. The speaker, however, rebuts the argument by asserting that many experts discover beautiful and complex artifacts near the amazon. These items could have been only produced by highly advanced society. So, the speaker maintains the notion writer insists is erroneous.
Finally, the article argues that European expeditions proved that no gigantic civilization exist on the Amazon. On the other hand, the professor counters the contention by stating that since the Amazon is vast, there may be uncovered regions. The vast region would have made it impossible for European expeditions to discover the immense civilization. Furthermore, the jungle could hire entire cities for centuries as in the case Angkor Watt Cambodia. Therefore, the professor claims the idea the article argues does not make sense.
Good (26–30) 내용 정리 잘하셨습니다. 문법도 괜찮습니다.
수고하셨습니다~~ |