▶ Your Answer : In
the lecture, the speaker asserts that the methods suggested in the reading are not
viable. This contradicts the reading passage’s point that there are plausible
ways to accomplish carbon sequestration.
To
begin with, the lecturer maintains that increasing the amount of phytoplankton
by adding iron to the oceans will not be permanent. To be specific, when organisms
multiply, they lack of nitrogen which will lead to the decline of the
population. Even when large quantity of iron is added, only small amount of CO2
can be stored. This is in direct opposition to the reading’s claim that adding
iron-rich dust to the ocean will encourage more of the organisms to grow,
increasing the amount of CO2 stored in the oceans.
Furthermore,
the speaker contends that it is ineffective to create artificial wetlands to sequester
CO2. This is because, artificial wetlands can store 23% less than natural wetlands
and it takes too long to be fully developed. This rebuffs the reading passage’s
assertion that creating artificial wetlands can reduce the amount of CO2 that
enters the atmosphere.
Lastly,
the lecturer claims that it is problematic to store CO2 in coal mines. To
explain, when CO2 is combined with coal, methane is released which also emits
CO2 when it is burned. Also, some of them can leak out of the atmosphere. This
is in contradictory to the reading’s insistence that CO2 can remain in the coal
mine for hundreds of years. Good: 24~30 점수:24 일단 리딩과 리스닝을 적절하게 분배하여서 비교하였습니다. 하지만 지금 이 에세이에서 조금 아쉬운 부분은 리딩에 대한 언급이 많이 부족한 거 같습니다. 한 문장으로 리딩의 대한 정보를 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 리딩에 대한 정보를 더 넣는 것이 좋을 거 같습니다. 이러한 부분 이외에는 문제가 별로 없는 통합형 에세이입니다. 잘 서술하엿습니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |