▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage there is ample support for the author’s claim that it is less likely that there was a advanced civilization in Amazon rain forest. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point. First, the professor contends that there was a study about Amazon and researchers found some connections such as canals pass the jungle. By using these construction, people could walk through the forest and build a developed society. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that it was impossible that make an enormous and advanced civilization because people could not move well in the dense vegetation. Next, the professor insists that the items they made were considerably elaborate. For example, they produced ceramics and sophisticated bowls. This shows that they had advanced technologies. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that they lacked technologies to build a large society since they just made very simple tools. Finally, the professor argues that it is reasonable that the remains are not discovered. Because of a dense forest, the heritages are easy to be obscure. For instance, the several countries’ remains were excavated lately by French explorers. This refutes the reading passage’s suggestion that Europe expeditions determined that there was not any developed civilization there. Good: 24~30 점수: 27 통합형 에세이에서 가장 적합한 에세이인거 같습니다. 문법적인 문제도 별로 없고요. 각 각의 리딩과 리스닝 부분들이 빠지는 정보없이 적절하게 비교된 거 같습니다. 리딩과 리스닝을 적절하게 비교하므로 써 이 통합형 에세이의 가장 중요한 부분들을 효과적으로 충족시켰습니다. 앞으로도 계속 이렇게 서술하다 보면 더 좋은 점수를 받을 수 잇을 거 같습니다. 수고많으셧습니다.
|