▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there are is ample support for the author's claim about causes of the Little Ice Age. However, the professor gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point. First, the professor contends that there is no proof that the decrease of sunspot caused the solar radiation to diminish diminished. According to a study, the researchers found that when the sunspot decreased, the solar radiation did was not reduced when the number of sunspots decreased. In other words, the number of sunspots is not related to the total solar radiation. This refutes the reading passage's attention claim that the decreased solar radiation is attributed linked to the reduction in the number of sunspots's number. Second, the professor insists that the volcanic eruption is not the reason cause (reason 쓰실 경우에는 문장을 더 풀어서 쓰셔야 합니다) of the Little Ice Age. This is because the eruption did not last for centuries. It lasted only for a while compared to the Little Ice Age which happened for a long time. This casts doubts on the reading passage's claim that thedust and ash from the volcanic eruption prevented the solar radiation from reaching the Earth. Third, the professor argues that the increase in the Earth's reflectivity cannot be the cause of the Little Ice Age. To explain, glaciers and snow are not the only cause of the factors for the Earth's high reflectivity. In other words (이전 문장과 연결이 되지 않고 있습니다), the clouds are also important can also lead to high reflectivity cause of it. However, those days, the decrease in water evaporation triggered the reduction of cloud covers (?). This counters the reading passage's assertion that the ice and snow reflected the solar energy resulting in the dropped temperatures dropped.
Score: Limited (1-16), Fair (17-23), Good (24–30) Comments: - 자잘한 문법 실수들이 있습니다. - 포인트를 잘 캐치하셨고 흐름이 좋습니다. - 그러나 문장들이 다소 심플한 편이고 비슷한 표현들을 반복적으로 사용하고 계십니다. - In other words는 이전 문장과 in other words 뒷 절이 잘 연결이 될 경우에만 사용해주세요. |