▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that there are three theories to explain the phenomenon called 'will-o'-the-wisp'. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First, the lecturer contends that chemical materials are not the cause of the lights. In a test, researchers found that the light by a chemical reaction does not resemble that of the light. To be specific, the color of light caused by chemical test was cool greenish, but the color of the eerie light was warm yellow. This counters the reading passage's assertion that the glowing light is made by chemical reaction. - 관사 사용에 주의해주세요. (a/the) Next, the lecturer claims that fireflies cannot be the light. This is because they live in large areas, but the light is found in small areas. In addition, they blink on and off, whereas the light illuminate without blinking. This casts doubt on the reading's claim that flying insects can be the likely cause of the phenomenon.
The final point made by the lecturer is that it is unlikely that barn owls are the source of the light. Because their plumage is not entirely white, it is impossible for them to reflect the light. This refutes the reading's claim that they might be the cause of the light.
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
FAIR
|
FAIR
|
GOOD
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
- Lecture detail을 조금 더 보충해주세요.
|