▶ Your Answer :
While the author argues that there are three plausible evidences of the existence of Bigfoot, the lecturer opposes that the evidences are too weak to prove their existence. First, the speaker contends that the story of two men who found the body of a dead Bigfoot reported by famous news networks was not true. A person who gave money to the men because of their finding had been deceived. He knew the truth after the story was broadcasted and he did not want to disappoint people who believed in Bigfoot’s existence. However, the author contends that Bigfoot's dead body was found by two men and it was covered by notable news network. Additionally, the lecturer says that a lot of Bigfoot sightings are false. This is because there are some random people who say they saw a Bigfoot, but their bones have not been found at all. This goes against the reading passage's assertion that since there are a lot of Bigfoot sightings, Bigfoot is exists.
Finally, the professor argues that Gigantopithecus are not the ancestor of Bigfoot. While Gigantopithecus had big sized brain and walked with four feet, Bigfoot has small brain and walked walks with two feet. This contradicts the author's argument that the existence of Bigfoot can be proved by the study of Gigantopithecus because the fossils of Gigantopithecus and Bigfoot are similar.
예상점수: 27-30 총평: 시제와 문장에서의 대구만 신경쓰시면 별다른 문제가 없을 것 같습니다. 내용도 잘 써주셨고 구성과 요약도 훌륭합니다. 수고 많으셨습니다. |