▶ Your Answer :
In the set of materials, the writer and the
speaker cover the issue of sucralose, an artificial sweetener. The professor
argues that the reading material’s claim is not convincing. This contradicts
the reading’s point that sucralose is harmful for people’s health.
First of all, the speaker points out that
sucralose is not the effect of increasing in the production of insulin. There
are other causes for producing insulin, she knows that in some test, it can be
seemed laving similar results. (이 부분은 어떤 의도로 말하려고 한 거 인가요? 설명 부탁드립니다) However, in general, there are many things which
show similar results but not the same cause. This casts doubt on the reading
material’s point that sucralose triggers an increase in the production of
insulin.
Moreover, the second argument the professor
asserts is that there is no evidence for showing to show that sucralose in high
temperature is the cause to cancer. To be specific, scientist did lab test, and
finally they found that sucralose which reaches a high temperature don’t does not contain toxic
substance and isn’t is not the reason for cancer. This counters the reading’s claim
that harmful substance can be produced from sucralose, when it is used for
cooking. This is because sucralose can combine with other chemical when the temperature
goes up.
Finally, the lecturer maintains that intense
allergic reactions are not the outcome of sucralose. There is not any evidence
to prove that idea. All scientist who did the tests say that test determines that sucralose is safe for dizzy and headache. Also, it can be the reactions
from patient’s mind. This refutes that one of the drawback of using sucralose
is that it can trigger severe allergic reactions. Good: 24~30 점수: 26 앞에서 첨삭 한것과 같이 문법적 오류들이 있습니다 특히 단수 복수 동사 형태에서 많이 틀리는 거 같습니다. 이러한 것들을 피하기 위해서 에세이를 쓰실 때 주어에 형태를 파악하고 동사의 형태를 알맞게 서술 하시는 게 좋을 거 같습니다. 대채로 서로 대립되는 리딩과 리스닝의 정보를 알맞게 배분한 거 같습니다. 다만 리딩의 정보가 좀 빠졌다라는 느낌이 들으니 리딩과 리스닝을 한 번 더 확인하시고 더 넣어야할 정보가 있음 넣어주시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다.
|