▶ Your Answer : In the lecture, the speaker contends that the claim is groundless. , which contradicts the reading passage’s assertion that the hammerhead shark’s appearance have some specific evolutionary advantages. To begin with, the speaker states that the hammerhead’s flat and wide head doesn’t give it does not give excellent depth perception of vision. This is because it is only true when the shark sees something which is far from them. Also, they are not able to see objects right in front of them. This is in contradictory to contradicts the reading passage’s opinion that the shark’s unique structure of the head enhances vision. The second argument the lecturer makes is that the shape of the shark doesn’t give it does not give a better sense of smell than other sharks. To be specific, other kind of sharks can smell as well as the hammerhead does. Also, there is no scientific evidence that the hammerhead’s shape allows them to smell better. So, there is no better advantage compared from other sharks. This view is in direct opposition to the reading’s claim that the appearance of its head gives it a good sense of smell. Finally, the lecturer maintains that they don’t do not use their head to turn. They actually use their back born, which is very flexible so that they can turn quickly. This refutes the reading passage’s insistence that the animal’s unique head shape help them to turn quickly. Good: 24~30 점수: 26 대채로 대립되는 리딩과 리스닝을 아주 잘 비교하였습니다. 제가 모든 정보를 알 고 있는 것이 아니기 때문에. 본인이 다시 에세이를 검정 하 실 때에 리딩과리스닝을 꼼꼼히 읽으신후 빠진 부분이 있으면 넣어주시면 될 거 같습니다. 몇몇 부분에서 틀린부분이 있는데 그게 뭐냐면. 에세이 형태에서는 줄인말을 쓰면 안됩니다. 이 부분을 조심하시길 바랍니다. 수고 하셨습니다. |