▶ Your Answer :
Both
the reading and the listening are talking
talk about the possibility
of humans being able to live on Venus. that
human can live in Venus. While the author noted argues (noted는 fact를 확인했다, 라는 뜻에 더 가까워요.) that it is impossible, the professor mentions that it
is possible.
Firstly,
the author indicateds that Venus'
atmosphere is very poor. According to the author, Venus' atmosphere lacks air. (air은 셀 수 없는 명사이기 때문에 few를 사용할 수 없습니다.) has just few air. Therefore,
it is relatively hard to live on Venus than on than Earth in terms of the
atmosphere. In contrast, the lecturer mentions that air of surface (air of surface가 뭐죠?) of
Venus is actually higher than what people's thought, so people can live on Venus because Venus'
atmosphere is equal or higher than that of Earth. (Venus의 atmosphere이 지구보다 높은게 아니라, 지구의 atmosphere보다 높은 거라고 해주셔야 합니다)
Secondly,
the writer provided the reservoir's absence in Venus in order to strengthen the reading's passage argument.
According to the writer, since Venus does not have any
reservoir, it could make (생산을 한다는 말인가요? 더 적절한 표현을 사용해 주세요)
dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid instead of oxygen or water vapor. On the
other hand, the speaker points out that there are adequate water and oxygen in
Venus at least for people to survive surviving
people so it is not problem to people live in Venus.
Finally,
the reading passage demonstrated that there is limited sunlight in Venus'
surface, In addition, since most clouds are a
lot of clouds fill on Venus' surface, the circumstance is more
terrible. However, the professor argues that Venus' clouds are thin. Therefore,
sunlight can more reach to the surface of Venus more than what people's
thought. The professor additionally indicates that it is possible to construct a sunlight energy system for living.
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Limited (0-16) |
Score |
12 |
Overall
Comment: |
통합형은 짧아서 문법 오류가 나면
더 티나고 감점을 받을 확률이 더 높습니다. 문법 오류가 매우 많으시니 위 지적사항들을 참고해 주시길 바랍니다. 두 본문의 내용은 잘
비교해 주셨으나, 문법 및 철자 오류들을 조심하셔야 할 것 같습니다. |
|
|