▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage covers three major
points concerning the primary functions of the Great Zimbabwe. The listening
passage, however, clearly states that why these points are debatable.
The first point made by the author is that
the site was used as a defensive fortress to defend people because stone walls
in the site were large enough to protect them. However, the speaker challenges this
by mentioning that there must be a permanent source of water in order to be an
appropriate refuge. Since there are no signs of water supply and defensive
constructions in the site, the site may not be functioned as a refuge. (But을 문장 맨 앞에 작성하는 것을 지양해주세요.)
Another point made by the writer is that
the site was a palace for king's family as the word "Zimbabwe" is
originated from "venerated houses". On the contrary, the lecturer
asserts that this is not true due to the fact that the word also represents
"houses of stones". In addition, the fact that 20,000 people lived in
the site supports the idea that the site was a full-sized city, not a palace.
Thus, the idea that the Great Zimbabwe was a palace might not be persuasive.
Lastly, the reading claims that the
site was a religious center since the cave in the site was probably used to make mysterious sounds to devotees. (주 문장이 앞에 나오고 since로 연결되는 문장은 뒤로 빼 주세요.) The professor debunks this by saying that it was a
non-religious place because cave was used by king to amplify his voice to
transmit the information to his servants.
Writing 0–30 score scale: Limited (1-16) / Fair (17-23) / Good (24–30)
ADDRESSING TOPIC
|
ORGANIZATION
|
PROGRESSION AND COHERENCE
|
LANGUAGE USE
|
GRAMMAR
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
GOOD
|
각 카테고리별 SCORE: LIMITED / FAIR / GOOD
|
= 각 point 별로 내용이 잘 정리된 글입니다. 수고하셨습니다.
|