The speaker contends that people would not continuely continue to use coal in the future. She casts doubt on the reading passage's assertion that the coal will be constantly utilized in the future.
To begin with, the lecturer asserts that it is doubtful that people can easily mine coal. She points out that the surfaces that can be mined to acquire the coal are limited and mining the coal requires people to deeply dig deep and thus be equipped with skills and technology. This is in direct opposition to the reading's point that the coal is not difficult to mine.
On top of that, the speaker maintains that it is unlikely that people don't do not need to spend a lot of money transporting coal. What this means is that the Because coal is very heavy, so people should use many trucks and trains to ship it the coal. For this reason, they have to expend spend high cost and efforts. This is contradictory to the reading passage's argument that transporting the coal is cheap.
Lastly, the lecturer argues that it is unreasonable that people can have more chances to get jobs through coal industry. She supports her idea by saying that these days, coal companies are making efforts to reduce labor costs cost of workers. So the companies will purchase more machines, instead of hiring new workers. This rebuffs the reading's insistence that the coal industry will give people more chances to get jobs.
Writing 0-30 scale
Good (25-26)
전반적으로 두 지문의 내용은 잘 요약하고 비교했습니다. 다만 문법이나 표현 면에서 부족함이 있습니다. 특히 관사(a/an/the/무관사)의 선택에 신경 쓰세요.