▶ Your Answer :
While the author of the reading passage argues that there are three
reasons why the method of single stream recycling has some advantages, compared
to reprocessing through separation. The lecturer opposes the reading’s
assertion with counter views.
First of all, the professor maintains that the claim related to threat
for factory workers seems flawed since safe training can solve the problem. To
explain, although pieces of metal are dangerous for the employees, they can
learn how to wear protective gears by the safety education to avoid getting
hurt. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s argument that the risky matters
in the single stream recycling process pose a threat for the laborers.
Additionally, the speaker mentions that the opinion regarding waste
contamination looks baseless because the separation method also has the same trouble
as the single stream one. Besides, the latter is better than the former in that
a lot of professional workers in the single stream way do reclaiming procedures
on trash not only frequently but also accurately. This contradicts the point of
the reading that the staffs may fail to classify waste things into each type,
polluting the environment.
Finally, the debater contends that the suggestion concerning a negative
economical factor in a business adopting a single stream technique appears
mistaken, owing to the fact that the litter-reusing approach save a cost of its
operation in the long term. To be more specific, the garbage disposal manner needs
only one truck although the way of dividing recyclables requires plenty of such
vehicles, reducing expense on human labor cost. This goes against the idea
presented in the article that introducing expensive machines for the single
stream process impacts negatively on a company engaging in the procedure. |