▶ Your Answer :
In the given materials, there are some arguments about encyclopedias. The lecture questions the three
points of the reading's assertion that communal online encyclopedias have some
important problems.
The first point the lecture makes is that the both the
online encyclopedias and printed ones may have mistakes, but the errors on the
internet can be changed quickly. If the wrong information is found in the
printed encyclopedias, it is hard to correct it. This contradicts the reading's
view that online encyclopedia have inaccurate information because the authors
have less academic credentials.
Another claim the lecture puts an emphasis on is that there
are two ways to protect the information of the online encyclopedias. First, no
one can change any information on the 'read-only' format. Second, special
editors always monitor the online encyclopedias. This refutes the reading's
argument that vandals or hackers may change or delete information on the internet.
Finally, according
to the lecture, it is a great advantage that the online encyclopedias have huge
and diverse information. The reason why the printed encyclopedias judge how
important the information is or not is limited space on the paper. This counters
the reading's aspect that the online encyclopedias do not distinguish what they
include or exclude because they have too much information.
Good (24–30) 서론 -there are some 뒤에 오므로 복수 argument's' 로 써주세요.
reading 의 view를 조금만 더 구체적으로 써주시면 더 좋은 내용 정리가 됩니다.
수고하셨습니다~~
|