The reading passage argues that
the fall of Annasazi population, in an area where they used to be flourished,
during the end of the thirteenth century would be because of a severe drought.
However, the lecturer casts doubt on this argument by asserting that there are
many controversies on this issues.
First of all, lecturer maintains
that bones from the Annasazi’s historical sites did not mean anything. This is
because, at that time, malnutrition like vitamin deficiencies was very common
among the people. Furthermore, they were also having a hard time with
malnutrition even when foods they could eat were abundant. This refutes the
reading passage’s argument that bones found on the Annasazi
Assnasozi graves prove that they left the place because of insufficient
diet, which indicates that drought might would would
have been very serious in the period.
Second, lecturer asserts that the
Annasazi’s historical artifacts such as clay and beams do not necessarily mean
that they tried to preserve their land before they left because of a drought.
The lecturer casts doubts on the fact that they
did not come back after they left the land. If they left in order to avoid a
severe drought, then they would have come back to the site, once the drought
was over. This contradicts the reading passage’s assertion that the condition
of the original site signifies that they would have abandoned the land
temporarily because of a drought.
Third, the lecturer contends that
the Annasazi’s new settlements do not possess abundant water supplies. She
points out that Arizona in which the Annasazi newly occupied has very
limited water sources and is not appropriate for crops to be cultivated. This
area is even harsher than the former area where they previously occupied. This
counters the reading passage’s claim that the evidence, which shows enough
water sources from the new Annasazi’s settlements, signifies that drought would
have been a critical reason that the people abandoned their previous land.
Good (24-26)
서론
-this issue 의 단수형으로 써주세요. this 단수지칭이고, 하나의 이슈를 말하고 있으므로 단수형이 적절합니다.
첫번째 본문
-철자 오류. Assanasozi-->Annasazi proofreading으로 더 꼼꼼히 체크해주세요.
-가정법 구문은 might have been 혹은 would have been 입니다. might would 같이 쓰지 않습니다.
두번째 본문
-casts doubt on 구문입니다.
전체적으로 내용 정리는 괜찮습니다. 가정법/특정 틀이 있는 구문에 대해서 더 연습해주세요.
주장한다, 반박한다에 해당하는 어휘들은 골고루 잘 쓰셨습니다. 언급된 부분들 개선하시면 점수 오르실 것입니다.
수고하셨습니다~~