The
reading passage contends that there are several methods to using coal without
harmful effects on environment. On the other hand, the lecture contradicts the
argument, saying it is difficult to reduce the damage based on coal.
First,
the speaker argues that gasification is not a good solution to decrease the
damage. This is because converting coal into a gas creates a huge amount of
heat, so it needs water. Therefore water can be contaminated during the work of
gasification. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s
claim that gasification can prevent to emit air pollution.
Next,
according to the lecture, extracting the pollutants made by coal is also not a
better idea. The reason is that even though it can collect the harmful dust, it
cannot capture carbon dioxide that is the cause of global warming. This
counters the reading passage’s assertion that the
extracting method that uses a form of static electricity is an alternative
method.
The final point made
by the lecture is that using fabric filters can be a solution to reduce harmful
pollutants, but it needs a lot of time and energy. So Thus, it is very difficult to replace using fabric
filters. This refutes the reading passage’s argument that
fabric filters are an option to reduce coal’s impact.
Good (24–28)
결론
-So, And, But으로 문장 시작하는 것보다는 Thus, Also, However 로 시작하는 것이 더 좋습니다.
전체적으로 괜찮습니다. reading내용을 조금만 더 보충해주시면 더 글이 디테일해질 것 입니다.
수고하셨습니다~~