▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage contends that nuclear
energy is more efficient and inexhaustible than conventional energy. On the
other hand, the professor contradicts to the reading's points made about nuclear energy.
First, the writer states that utilizing nuclear
energy is cost-effective since fossil fuels, such the price as oil and gas, will
increase each year due to its limited amount. However, the speaker says that
even though the basic ingredient of nuclear energy is cheap, it costs more than
conventional one. This is because the expense for building plants for nuclear
energy plants are is too expensive and some plants in Canada actually failed to complete
their nuclear plants due to its high expenses.
Second, the author maintains that the nuclear
power is environmentally friendly because it does not contribute to on global warming.
In contrast, the lecturer claims that it is not true since it causes thermal pollution
in marine ecosystem. To be specific, to get cool effect, (Is that cooling effect?) many nuclear plants
use enormous water and release the heated water to oceans or rivers so that it
produces many lots of bad effects to marine creatures.
Finally, the reading passage states that
the nuclear energy wastes can be disposed without difficulty since its remnant
are so small enough to bury underground safety. On the contrary, the professor
says that the problem is the increased radioactivity of nuclear wastes after the fission
process. To explain, the radioactivity can lead to human to various health issues,
even to death when people are exposed to it only for a moment. For now, most of
the wastes are just stored in power plants with this reason.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | Score | Good 23-26 | - 몇 가지 표시된 minor한 실수가 보였지만 대체적으로 정확한 세 가지 포인트를 명시하고 그에 관련한 이유를 자연스럽게 연결시키셨어요.
- 명칭 등의 부분을 보다 상세히 나타내주면 더 훌륭한 점수를 얻을 수 있을 거에요.
|
|