While the author of the reading passage argues that these days, high school students learn less history than they used to do, which is not good, the lecturer opposes the reading’s assertion with different views.
First of all, the speaker argues that students do not have to study world history to appreciate other countries. Foreign language courses are rising now and it can help to open students eyes to the world. This calls into question the reading passage’s argument that because learning history can help students to experience other countries, it is bad for students to do not take world history courses.
Additionally, the lecturer points out that students are taking the courses which are well developed and require to think deeply. Sometimes teachers show the students television program, such as documentary and it is helpful to understand the community. This goes against the reading passage’s assertion that students are taking poorly designed courses instead of taking history courses.
Finally, the professor contends that these days, problems we are facing are different from the past issues, so knowing about history is not the only way to figure out the solutions to the problems. This contends the idea presented in the reading passage that understanding the past is the only way to solve the problems.
Good; 24~30
점수: 27
대채로 서로다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝을 적절하게 잘 비교하엿습니다. 통합형
에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 본인의 에세이를 통하여서 상대방을
설득 할 수 있냐 입니다. 지금 이 에세이는 이러한 면에 있어서 아주 잘 서술하였습
니다 한 쪽 만 취우쳐진 정보가 아니라 리딩 리스닝 둘 다 적절하게 서술된 거 같습
니다 수고많으셨습니다.