▶ Your Answer :
Some people take it for granted that spending money on the education of young kids is more efficient than spending money on universities. However, contrary to this notion, it is evident that supporting a lot of universities is more practical than supporting the education of young children. The rationale behind this is that many young children can not be recognized by the government's support, and most staffs who are related with universities can broaden their perspectives.
To begin with, funding for many young kids is not practical to their education. This is mainly because, in fact, they do not have an ability that recognize other's help. They rarely feel that they are supported by the government, and this is not more economical than funding for many universities. Consequently, we cannot rapidly reach the successful development of a country. For example, when I was a kid, our school was aided by the government. Thus, they built an building for gym, and many children often played with their classmates. However, many children did not recognized difference between playing in the gym and outdoor playground. Even, they preferred to hang out with their friends out of the gym. This was because, although intention of the government was improving their education and a country, many children cannot recognized their intention and thank for their financial aid.
Furthermore, supporting to many universities can widen their horizons. This is due to the fact that, unlike funding for the education of young children, the government's financial aid actually can expose staffs and students to the different cultures, thoughts, and lifestyle that is never known before. Consequently, we can take a quantum leap in intellectual growth and accept diversity in an era of globalization. For instance, when I was a graduated student, our team related with geological science was financially aided by the government. As a result, we learned about many knowledge germane to my major, and even found a revolutionary principal. Consequently, we made a product from the principal and can have a positive effect on our environment. If we had not funded by them, we would not find several good things.
In short, both opponents and proponents have debated over this disputable issue and both sides seem to have good reasons to support their arguments. Nevertheless, from my perspective, I would be confident that it is not more crucial for a government to support to the education of young kids than to support to universities, concerning that people and our society will benefit from it. |