▶ Your Answer : Some people think government don`t have to concern about environment, if they want to grow their economic. However, in my opinion, this perspective is not true for following two reasons which I am going to elaborate. To begin with, hurting environment is threaten public health. For detail, heathy body is the most important element to live happy. Environment get worse, then our health will get worse too. Take the Jane Goodall, For instance. She is globally recognized researcher of chimpanzee and Environmentalist. Listed among time`s 100 most influential person, Goodall mentioned in an interview preserving about environmental is the most valuable thing that we can do for next generation. Such comments sound very convincing since she is greatest environmentalist. I believe that the government not only promote economic for this generation but also preserve out natural for next generation. On top of that, neglecting environmental has greater economic loss in the long run. If government really concern about their economic growth, they must have long perspective. In detail, they spend so much money cleaning up later. Take the Chernobyl For example. Nuclear power plants are very useful and cheap energy for short term. However, they become disaster when they have some problem. In Chernobyl, they can even live area for 10 decays. This is uncountable loss for government. To sum up, government must not plan for economic than environment. this is because it can cause get public health worse and has bigger economic loss for long period. I believe that I had accurately demonstrated this matter for concrete reasons and evidence. Since views of life and values differ among individuals, it seems like this subject will remain controversial. |