Barley was the first grain to be cultivated by the ancient Egyptians. There is ample evidence that barley was
baked into loaves that were fermented to make beer. There is, however, no indication that Egyptians of that period ever ate loaves of barley or that they cooked barley to make any other food. Since the possibility that they
consumed barley raw can be safely dismissed, it seems probable that at one period the ancient Egyptians
consumed cultivated grain in the form of beer only.
In the argument given, the two highlighted portions play which of the following roles?
- AThe first introduces the circumstance, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is an assumption that is explicitly made in drawing the conclusion of the argument.
- BThe first introduces the circumstance, the explanation of which is at issue in the argument; the second is evidence that was used to support a position to which the argument is opposed.
- CThe first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second introduces a phenomenon that the argument seeks to explain.
- DThe first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second states a hypothesis that the argument as a whole seeks to refute.
- EThe first provides evidence to support the main conclusion; the second is a statement that is explicitly rejected in drawing that conclusion.
저는 B를 답으로 골랐거든요. 근데 답은 E네요
여기서 메인주장은 고대 이집트인들은 특정 기간동안 경작된 곡물을 맥주의 형태로 소비했다. 맞을까요?
그러면 첫번째 bold 문장이 어떻게 이 결론의 근거가 될 수 있을까요