▶ Your Answer :
The author contends that governments ought to focus on solving the immediate problems at hand rather than on solving the predicted problems of the future. While this may seem plausible in certain cases, there are circumstances that the author may not have considered. Admittedly, the author’s assertion that governments should first deal with today’s problems might hold true under certain circumstances. This is because there are a wide range of problems threatening people in difficult situations such as developing countries. These problems should be taken care of immediately, and governments have to solve these urgent problems as soon as possible. For example, in diverse developing countries and even in many advanced countries, there are a large number of people suffering from poverty and starvation. Thus, government can make an effort to solve this problem by aiding rudimentary living expenses. For another example, worldwide pandemic situations have occurred every 5~10 years. In order to prevent the diffusion of these severe diseases and save many susceptible people not being given sufficient medical care, each nation’s government should strive to develop vaccines and construct medical facilities. Accordingly, based on the above examples, the author’s claim seems plausible to some extent. However, the author’s assertion may not always be prudent. It is true that there are apparent problems at present. Yet, although some anticipated problems of the future is inconspicuous, they may be more disastrous and probably threat human existence. For instance, in the Earth, current natural resources are declining in fast rate. Therefore, unless the governments contemplate possible solutions for protect the resources or devise alternative supplements, in the foreseeable future, human would not be able to depend on this planet anymore. Moreover, for this reason, it is recommended for the governments to explore the space and improve space technology. Therefore, contrary to the author’s claim, concentrating on solving predictable future problems might be more crucial than problems at present. In conclusion, while the author’s contention emphasizing the significance of treating today’s problems might seem beneficial in certain cases, in consideration of above counterpoints, the author’s claim cannot be fully agreed with. |