▶ Your Answer :
The letter contends
that the company should execute electronic monitoring on employees to improve
their productivity. The argument is based on the national survey’s finding
which presents that the majority of workers with access to the internet at work
had used their PC with personal or recreational purpose. However, some
additional details may help determine whether installing software to monitor
employees’ internet use would be able to prevent employees from wasting time
and increase productivity and company’s overall profits.
The recommendation
cites recent national survey result to support the necessity for electronic
monitoring system. In doing so, it assumes that the result can be applied to
the company and the respondents of the survey can delegate the company’s employees.
However, there is no evidence that the employees might waste their time using
computer during workhour. Albeit the national survey can represent average workers’
penchant in the country, Climpson Industries might be a peculiar case in
comparison to other corporations. For example, Climpson Industries workers’
undertaking could be so burdensome that they might not profligate their time while
working to finish their work in time. In addition, if its performance-related
pay system works well, the employees would be eager to work harder than others instead
of lavish their time. The data would be more relevant if it presents that
Climpson Industries workers waste their time using computer as the respondents
of survey do.
Secondly, even
if the national survey result can be applied to the company, the letter
mentions that utilizing electronic monitoring system would be the best way to
benefit the company without sufficient grounds. It thereby assumes that the employees
would reduce wasted time and pour their resource for work. However, the policy
could cause adverse effect and another system to enhance workers’ productivity
can be devised. Suppose monitoring tool is installed on workers’ PC. They might
consider that the company might not trust them, which could deprive them of
fidelity to the company. Furthermore, the company would be able to prevent
workers from using computer for personal or recreational activities by just
installing software which block websites irrelevant to work. The argument would
be more convincing if it substantiates that there is no feasible alternative other
than installing monitoring system.
In summation, the
strength of proposal depends on variables unaccounted for in the letters, the
result of which would render the argument more or less convincing.
|