▶ Your Answer :
Some people said
that government should focus on short term solutions, because it can show
results in short time. And these results will affect citizens’ life and theirs
support. However, my opinion is long term solution is more important than short
term solution for the government. One reason is that government have to think
about descendants in the country, another reason is that it can save budget.
First of all,
the government should consider that the country will not be disappeared for a
long time. This is because solutions for short term can be effective solutions.
But a lot of these solutions cannot be applied in the future. For instance, In 1990th,
Korea was not have enough energy.
The government decided that nuclear energy is good for situation in Korea.
Therefore many nuclear power plants had built and had operating now. Almost all
Koreans are satisfied with energy from the nuclear power plants and use energy
without recognizing shortness. However, many people and government have
recognizing the dangerous side of the nuclear energy for descendants who live
in Korea. Since, now, earthquakes can be happened in the area where the plants
are built. After all, the government need a lot of budget for the shut down,
deposition of nuclear waste and also find and build new energy plants for
people who live after in Korea.
Secondly, the
long term solutions can save money, because the government has to consider a
lot of things that can be happened in the future carefully for the long term
city plans. For instance, presidents who want to govern the country for 5 years
will consider 5 or 6 years. This is because the presidents should make great
results when they are in their job. But If they can have a chance to be a next
president and be a president for a long time. They have to save budget and
consider for every single plan carefully. According to the study that compares
between presidents of Korea and Singapore, the result is that Singapore can
save 76% budget for same plans. This result implies that solutions and plans for
a long time can save money and be efficiency. Therefore, between same plans and
solutions for long or short terms from the government can be different
economically and effectiveness.
To sum up, the
long term solutions can be good for descendants who live after now and can be
more efficient.
In conclusions,
short terms are better for the rapid results and just for present people in the
country. But my opinion is that government should focus on long term solutions.
|