Your Answer ▼
It
is often argued that it is more advantageous for students to be educated with political
science education, even if it does not appeal to them at all. I completely
disagree with this opinion and I think that educating the basic course for
students in? (정확히 어떤 의미를 의도하셨는지 몰라서 100% 확답을 드리기에는 어렵네요.) each grade is more important than political education.
First
of all, I believe it is quite difficult for the younger generations especially,
for elementary and middle school students, to get the point learning about political
science since they have not got a chance and opportunity to experience a
realistic society. In Korea, there are specific education systems, which the
students for each grade, need to be taught. Thus, I think it might be a good
idea to focus on learning about basic academic skills in school. For example,
the adults, more than 20years old, only can get a voting authority in
accordance with the current government vote policy. (이 사실 자체가 위에서 하는 말이랑 어떻게 연관이 되는 건지를 구체적으로 작성해주세요~)
Moreover,
frequently teaching political science education will have a negative impact on
teenagers because I believe it makes students rigorous political orientation (여기는 댓글 한번 주세요!) before going to society and the world. During the school years, cultivating
their personality and learning about primary subjects such as math, science,
language and historical education are more beneficial for the students rather
than considering political science education. (윗 문단의 근거와 겹칩니다.)
To
conclude, I strongly believe students in school need to learn from a young age
that they should consider primary subjects carefully. they will naturally more
close to the political environment in their adult life later on. (이걸 대신해서, 정치 관련 내용은 배울 필요 없다~쪽으로 작성해주세요. 기초과목을 강조하는 것과, 정치를 부정하는 것은 전혀 다릅니다.) |