▶ Your Answer :Nowadays, secondary schools are teaching a foreign language.
It has been also suggested that primary schools should teach a foreign
language. Although there are opponents to this idea>> 콤마 빼주세요 and, indeed, there are
shortcomings to this proposal, I believe the advantages far outweigh the
disadvantages for the following reasons.
Most importantly,
psychologists have shown that the younger a person is, the faster he or she
learns a language >> the 비교급 형태는 사용하지 않으시는 편이 좋을 듯 싶네요 엄연히는 문법적으론 틀린 문장이 되기 때문이죠 구어체에선 굉장히 좋습니다. If they lose the optimal timing to learn it, it will >> if 절의 동사가 현재면 주절의 조동사는 현재로 와야 합니다 becomes
harder to absorb any language as they get are >> get동사는 뜻이 너무 많아 자칫 어휘의 부족함을 보여줄 수 있는 동사입니다 older.
Some people >> some만 쓰지 말아주세요 might disagree
with this view by citing some psychological studies, which found that kids are
confused, if they learn multiple languages at the same time. For example, if
their moms tell their kids both words “mommy” and “umma,” the Korean word
meaning mommy in Korean, they might speak “Good morning, umma.”, Without realizing they
are mixing two different languages.
There is a grain of the
truth to this argument. However, this side effect can be prevented by correctly
instructing correctly them that they are learning different languages, >> 콤마 빼셔도 됩니다 or by letting
different people teach different languages to the children. In this way, they
can naturally distinguish naturally >> 부사는 동사 뒤에 오도록 해주세요 the two languages.
Another reason to
instruct a foreign language at an earlier stage is that secondary school
curriculum in secondary school is largely occupied with mathematics and sciences, leaving inadequate
time for children to focus on acquiring a linguistic skill. Instead, If instead we ask the
secondary school students to study a foreign language too hard, their
mathematical dexterity >> 손의 재주가 좋은 것에 쓰입니다 will be suffered. For this reason, primary school period
is the best time to educate a foreign language.
Opponents to my view
would also still maintain that it is better for our country to concentrate on
instructing our own language>> 콤마 빼주세요 rather than a foreign one>> 콤마 빼주세요 to promote our culture
and identity. However, this nationalistic view is losing power in this
globalized society. Our culture could be made prosperous by interacting with
people from all over the world, and this interaction would be possible only when
the members of our country can speak at least one foreign language. Primary
schools teaching a foreign language will bring about more benefits than losses.
This is because it is human nature that people can learn a language more easily
when they are young, Delaying the education until a secondary school would
cause a confliction with other courses such as mathematics>> 콤마 빼주세요 and it has become vital
to be able to speak a foreign language in this globalized world.
우선 말씀드릴 것은 문장이 대체로 너무 깁니다 자꾸 수식만 하려다 보니 문장이 길어지게 됩니다 한 줄 ~ 한 줄하고 3분의 1 정도가 좋습니다 또한 내용이 비슷하게 자꾸 반복이 됩니다 훑어보시면 알겠지만 마지막 쯤에 가선 할 말이 한정되어 있다보니 비슷한 말이 계속 맴도는 것을 보실 수 있습니다 서론 형태의 글이 처음이 두 문단이 작성됐단 것도 오류입니다 서론 결론은 3~4줄 정도의 길이면 충분합니다 콤마는 너무 길 때 끊어줄 때, 계속적 용법, 세 개 이상 나열된 것의 마지막 and 앞에 정도면 충분합니다 mummy 의 예는 본인의 지식이나 경험으로부터 파생된 것이 아니라 테스크에 충족되진 않습니다
Task Achievement - 6 Coherence and Cohesion - 6 Lexical Resource - 6 Grammatical Range and Accuracy - 6 6.0 예상합니다 |