▶ Your Answer :
In the past, the trip was limited due to
the insufficient transportation mode. As society and technology develop, people
can travel around the world easily. Even though there are several reasons for
people to travel around the world, the dominant reasons could be the relaxation
reasons. Some people claimed that this trip should be limited because the
unnecessary tourist trips would only damage the environments. However, the restriction of such travel would
face the public's backlash and alternative ways of travel would increase. Also,
due to the frequent use of vehicles have severe impact on the environment than
that of airplanes.
It is undeniable that the use of aircrafts
consumes more fossil gases than that of car and as a result, it can harm the
environment more than that of cars. Nevertheless the amount of pollution
resulting from the unnecessary travels is fewer than that of vehicle pollution.
Driving a vehicle can travel around the country or nearby areas easier than
that of aircrafts, thus, the vehicles are more frequently used than
aircrafts. In the case of daily usage,
people travel more often by cars than aircrafts. According to the UK
statistics, 98% of British people travelled by vehicles, whereas 64% of British
travelled by airplane. Since the vehicles are using more frequently than that
of airplanes, pollutions coming from vehicles are more damaging to the
environment than that of aircrafts.
Even that, by regulating the flights to the
necessary trips would result the public's backlash. Since people have gotten
used to the travelling around the world and feeling relaxed from such travel,
the restriction of the flights would consider as the restriction of people's
rights for freedom. People would have the human rights to enjoy own's feelings
and the travel even though that is unnecessary. Furthermore, some people may
not agree with the unnecessary trip is tourist travel, since they can learn
various knowledge from travel. People can various knowledge to understand other
people's perspective by knowing such as culture, history and tradition. Also,
people can invigorate their energies from travelling before they concentrate
fully on their work. Since the restriction of flights would be considered as
the lost of all those factors mentioned above, the public would be backlash.
In conclusion, despite the airplanes can
cause environmental damages, it seems more severe than that of cars. However
the discouraging the flights would not stop people to travel and which cause
even more serious phenomenon to the environment and society. Also the public's
backlash will be inevitable. |