Recently, a lot of resources which can replace animals have been made by humans. Some people oppose to employing living creatures for eating, clothing and medical advancement. However, I disagree with the view for the following reasons.
The most Most individuals still require living creatures to maintain health condition with a balanced diet. This is because the diet includes protein which can be obtain from them. For instance, there are not only various vegetarians but also those who eat only meats and love meats. Although animal protein can be substituted by for other types of food, this is limited to particular types of food such as egg, bean and milk. Prohibiting the use of animals for food may deprive chances which enable to eat food freely and people can suffer from the loss of nutrients.
(새로운 문단인데, 조금 더 자연스럽게/매끄럽게 이어주세요!) A wide range of medicine has been developed developing for lengthening human lives. This academic field values considers the importance of saving human life more than protecting animal rights animals. Precisely, if animal research is not processed in regarding of drugs, individuals who take a drug will experience side effects directly. The risks and mortality about medicines will increase and the government can not guarantee the public's safety in the state. The medicine without animal research should have harm effects on human. It Thus is not suitable for medical objectives and can not develop the field.
In conclusion, I can assume that the use of living creatures is needed for food and medicine due to fact that people have right to eat food freely for their healthy and medicine includes potential risks for human lives.
총평: (7/6/7/6) 6.5
내용 관련해서는 매끄럽게 적어주신 편이고, 제가 살짝만 msg 쳐드렸는데 그쪽을 위주로 참고해보시면 되겠습니다. 자잘한 오류도 같이 수정해주시고요~수고하셨습니다 :)